Mórar-nærvídd / Revenants-Proximal Dimension

Reykjavík 2004  

Directions

The two of them walk on the potholed road, away from here, towards the bottom of the image that appears to us. It has been raining and the rain has left us a different image of this area than the one we had before; we are located in the present. We don’t see where the two of them are coming from, we can only see what lays in front of us. They become smaller with each step, and when they disappear behind the hill that spreads out at the top of the frame the next picture takes over – but we can’t see that picture; at the moment our eyes are occupied by the past.

Here is a mountain and the mountain is sheltering a house. But no one lives in this house and therefore we don’t know what the inside looks like. It gazes upon the lawn outside through its hollow sockets; it gazes its own space, but nothing that it sees changes by being seen – everything continues to stay the same as always. At first I feel like time has erased all life that once was to be found here, but after a short contemplation I realize that it happened the other way around.

By looking around, the following questions emerge. What is the color of the grass reaching down towards the edge of the lake – and what is the color of the water? Is it possible to say that the mountain – when one looks in the other direction – displays a specific color, or that the dead eyes of an abandoned house are the same color as death? Is the rock lying on the ground somehow differently colored then the next rock? And what is the color of the sun? Does its color change when it disappears below the horizon? I don’t know the answers to these questions – first I need to see the grass, the water, the mountain, the abandoned house, the rock lying on the ground and the rock next to it, and the sun on the other side of the horizon.

The only purpose of the road is to point us in the direction that it is leading. The road doesn’t have any other purpose. And I’m not on the way that it suggests; I’m on my way here. For I recognize this place – here everything is as if it had been created from my own ideas: the mountain, the house, the water and the expanse, all of it small enough to easily fit in the eyes.

Massachusetts, Dec. 2001

Revenants

The phantoms suggested by the title of Katrín Elvarsdóttir’s series, Revenants, are of a different variety than the spectres that might float through a keyhole. The ghosts glimpsed in her photographs have more to do with things left behind to memory — earthly things, perhaps, but just as haunting. The items or places are inert, yet it is as if they radiate with some last vestige of emotion — a last gasp of imparted spirit.

The landscapes, originated on archaic equipment barely more advanced than a pinhole camera, hark back to the earliest era of photography. The territory is of a rural Iceland whose inhabitants have died out or moved on to better prospects, a condition not uncommon to many parts of the world, the cause being anything from industrialization, to climate change. The result is that the environments depicted could be of any high latitude, whether the post-Soviet Union, Labrador, or Patagonia. But because it is Iceland, the ghosts implied within the title are specific to their own culture. The Icelanders themselves may be re-established in Reykjavík or on extended trips around the world. But the folklore remains among the ruins, as if the previous generations left behind a sediment of emotion that has been absorbed into the soil, rendering each outcrop a sentient being. And if the Icelandic interpretation of their mythology is more literal than in other parts of Northern Europe, this would seem a logical enough proposition. Mythology has always fermented in the opaque regions just beyond sight of the campfire, or in the modern era, the zone beyond certifiable evidence. In the effort to maintain an authentic identity within the larger western industrial civilization, a link to superstition has carried over, allowing for a good amount of leeway in retaining a sense of the elves.

The land is nameless, the titles of the images not so much documenting specific locations in Iceland as denoting realms no more accessible than the ether of memory. It is in this way that the parallels exist between Katrín Elvarsdóttir’s own origins and her work, as she was born in Ísafjördur in 1964, but her family relocated to Reykjavík. After a period spent abroad during her teens in Sweden, she attended the University of Iceland studying French literature, followed by an extended stay in the U.S., where her inclination shifted to photography. Out of such an environment with so many disparate instincts, Katrín’s own personal sensibility resonates with an unflappable integrity. An individual artist with a distinctive body of work, she has functioned and survived within a larger, prevailing global culture, as evident in her shows during the late 1990s in Reykjavík, Florida, Denmark, and New England. Whether in photographs or collage assemblies, her imagery strikes a balance between narrative and a strong graphic instinct.

In Revenants, her attention shifts back towards the territory of her origins. She has pared down her technology to the most rudimentary of 120 format cameras, reducing her choices to the essential exposure, the rudimentary optics dictating a unity within the images, with concentric degrees of illumination emphasizing innate distances as palpable and yet indescribable as any glimpse of Elysium or Beulah Land. The result is not unlike an alchemist’s camera obscura capturing evidence of a place that is at once just beyond the lens but as inaccessible as the netherworld.

It is indeed an ethereal heritage that Katrín has returned home to. Yet for all the prevailing themes that unify the series, there are as many elements that distinguish each individual photograph.

In photograph “Suðurland II” (2001) the exposure evokes not so much Iceland, but a Soviet Union of secret numbered cities or forgotten gulags. As if in a surreptitious snap taken by an exile, or by remote sensing, the northern sun illuminates what could be either launching gantries or oil wells, the technology reduced by the environment to its most primitive form. And for all the light shining downward, the cold is all encompassing, even while the chimera of the spires would suggest radiation passing through them, rendering everything within the frame lifeless, the dark swath at the bottom of the image not so much earth as inert sediment.

“Norðurland III” (2001) is, of course, more blatant in suggesting a Soviet/post-Soviet venue, as the Cyrillic lettering on the ship’s superstructure leaves little doubt as to its origin. The connection between the two worlds would seem logical enough, the shore being on the edge of the abyss, the Arctic beginning just beyond view. Whatever comes from over the horizon, whether Russian freighters, Siberian driftwood, Maersk containers, crates of oranges, or Algerian corsairs, their influences are deposited with the currents, forgotten a month later, but remembered for generations.

“Snæfellsnes” (2001) with its emptied house and connected outbuildings sitting at the foot of a glaciated mountain, the disposition of the sky and the line of the mountain carries a homely trace. As if harking back to the idyll of a silent film epic, the site resembles an archaic redoubt, however the substance, structure, and size of the ruin would indicate a fairly recent past. With its asymmetrical lines and lopsided cavities, the decrepitude is all pervasive — the former occupants having either perished or moved on to a more sustainable existence, as if the region as been formally deincorporated and declared an empty quarter, abandoned to the hinterlands.

In “Strandir II” (2000) the wreckage of the grounded ship, devoid of any masts or deck structure, righted only by an external framework, has merged with the land and the harbor, forming an inadvertent promontory. The hull, although still solid, would appear to have been picked clean by salvagers, its crew having disembarked more or less in safety to the shore. It is a sight reminiscent of the Falklands Islands and other high-latitude outposts, with generations of working ships beached and written off rather than venture further into treacherous seas. Any sense of memorializing seems happenstance, no plaques being necessary, the long, sculptural lines of the hulk itself serving as enough of a monument.

“Norðurland II” (2001) with its surplus Quonset Hut and mid-sixties Oldsmobile carries over to what now seems as much a mythic era in that it could be called “Middle Cold War.” The iconography of both the hut and car scream of a shabby American nostalgia, and unlike the previous images, it is not an abandoned site. The light above the car is on, glowing faintly, and there are no uneven traces of debris in the foreground, just a sparse functionality of the environs. But at most, there would seem to be only a skeleton shift in a workshop, the machinery idling during a summer dusk, the American influences counting as a decorative layer already settling back into the earth.

In “Strandir I” (2000) it is not clear if the factory overlooking the span of water, like the previous image, is a derelict or is functioning on some basic level, as a faint wisp of vapor emanating from the chimney appears to mimic the low-hanging cloud in the harbor. But it is the barest sign of life, as the right angles of the building settle into a foreground that is as opaque as volcanic ash – a parked car rendered a faint, half-submerged shape, lost among the murk. With its smudged cement surfaces, worn by time and the elements, it is hard to image the factory ever having supported itself so far on the periphery of any larger economy. Its only apparent link is the water and the narrow causeway and winding road on the right, and yet it might be purely illusionary, as if faces could be glimpsed in the detail as well. All that remains amidst the composition and the interplay of light is that the structure remains, the smokestack still reaching upward, almost a monument, a rust-belt obelisk.

“Að Norðan” (2000) sits under a shroud of overcast, the solitary stucco cottage reflected in a mudpuddle. It could be Ireland or straight out of the remembered potato fields of Günter Grass’s Kashubia, and somehow, as if by virtue of its placement within the frame, the cottage evokes a grandmotherly presence, left behind to a hardscrabble existence. It is a sentimental premise, or at least a projected sentiment, as the gulf between the comfortable, reflective present and the earlier generations who tried to make a viable living off such a landscape and often failed continues to haunt as much as any specter.

That “Suðurland I” (2001) should follow “Að Norðan” makes perfect sense, for beyond the link in the weather and the rain-filled puddles, the road winding towards the horizon is no doubt escaping the isolated world of the previous image. There is no sense of arrival, only departure, as if setting off and severing ties is an inevitable fact, but the loss is undeniable. For as much as the landscape is comprehended, having been measured, divided, and worked to exhaustion, it is only upon return that the final aesthetic transformation is apparent.

If arrival is to be had, it is in “Suðurnes” (1999) the overcast of the earlier images having broken, the road having deposited the perspective — in what may belie the title — to the edge of true North, Ultima Thule, the rough-hewn shrine serving as a marker. As much as it would seem morning, the lateness of the hour – or indeed the epoch – has been reached. It is the fact of the high latitude, the very sense of impossibility that buffets the place with a roar, and that there is indeed a palpable glory cast upon this knoll. It is a glory not dependent on the cross pushed up against the sky; the cross is simply another mythic application, another level of iconography, another visitor’s interpretation. The glory is that the patch of windblown high grass and distant mountain frame a rarefied pocket where the transcendent is to be glimpsed, a point where geography and the sublime converge.

Reykjavík 2004  

Directions

The two of them walk on the potholed road, away from here, towards the bottom of the image that appears to us. It has been raining and the rain has left us a different image of this area than the one we had before; we are located in the present. We don’t see where the two of them are coming from, we can only see what lays in front of us. They become smaller with each step, and when they disappear behind the hill that spreads out at the top of the frame the next picture takes over – but we can’t see that picture; at the moment our eyes are occupied by the past.

Here is a mountain and the mountain is sheltering a house. But no one lives in this house and therefore we don’t know what the inside looks like. It gazes upon the lawn outside through its hollow sockets; it gazes its own space, but nothing that it sees changes by being seen – everything continues to stay the same as always. At first I feel like time has erased all life that once was to be found here, but after a short contemplation I realize that it happened the other way around.

By looking around, the following questions emerge. What is the color of the grass reaching down towards the edge of the lake – and what is the color of the water? Is it possible to say that the mountain – when one looks in the other direction – displays a specific color, or that the dead eyes of an abandoned house are the same color as death? Is the rock lying on the ground somehow differently colored then the next rock? And what is the color of the sun? Does its color change when it disappears below the horizon? I don’t know the answers to these questions – first I need to see the grass, the water, the mountain, the abandoned house, the rock lying on the ground and the rock next to it, and the sun on the other side of the horizon.

The only purpose of the road is to point us in the direction that it is leading. The road doesn’t have any other purpose. And I’m not on the way that it suggests; I’m on my way here. For I recognize this place – here everything is as if it had been created from my own ideas: the mountain, the house, the water and the expanse, all of it small enough to easily fit in the eyes.

Massachusetts, Dec. 2001

Revenants

The phantoms suggested by the title of Katrín Elvarsdóttir’s series, Revenants, are of a different variety than the spectres that might float through a keyhole. The ghosts glimpsed in her photographs have more to do with things left behind to memory — earthly things, perhaps, but just as haunting. The items or places are inert, yet it is as if they radiate with some last vestige of emotion — a last gasp of imparted spirit.

The landscapes, originated on archaic equipment barely more advanced than a pinhole camera, hark back to the earliest era of photography. The territory is of a rural Iceland whose inhabitants have died out or moved on to better prospects, a condition not uncommon to many parts of the world, the cause being anything from industrialization, to climate change. The result is that the environments depicted could be of any high latitude, whether the post-Soviet Union, Labrador, or Patagonia. But because it is Iceland, the ghosts implied within the title are specific to their own culture. The Icelanders themselves may be re-established in Reykjavík or on extended trips around the world. But the folklore remains among the ruins, as if the previous generations left behind a sediment of emotion that has been absorbed into the soil, rendering each outcrop a sentient being. And if the Icelandic interpretation of their mythology is more literal than in other parts of Northern Europe, this would seem a logical enough proposition. Mythology has always fermented in the opaque regions just beyond sight of the campfire, or in the modern era, the zone beyond certifiable evidence. In the effort to maintain an authentic identity within the larger western industrial civilization, a link to superstition has carried over, allowing for a good amount of leeway in retaining a sense of the elves.

The land is nameless, the titles of the images not so much documenting specific locations in Iceland as denoting realms no more accessible than the ether of memory. It is in this way that the parallels exist between Katrín Elvarsdóttir’s own origins and her work, as she was born in Ísafjördur in 1964, but her family relocated to Reykjavík. After a period spent abroad during her teens in Sweden, she attended the University of Iceland studying French literature, followed by an extended stay in the U.S., where her inclination shifted to photography. Out of such an environment with so many disparate instincts, Katrín’s own personal sensibility resonates with an unflappable integrity. An individual artist with a distinctive body of work, she has functioned and survived within a larger, prevailing global culture, as evident in her shows during the late 1990s in Reykjavík, Florida, Denmark, and New England. Whether in photographs or collage assemblies, her imagery strikes a balance between narrative and a strong graphic instinct.

In Revenants, her attention shifts back towards the territory of her origins. She has pared down her technology to the most rudimentary of 120 format cameras, reducing her choices to the essential exposure, the rudimentary optics dictating a unity within the images, with concentric degrees of illumination emphasizing innate distances as palpable and yet indescribable as any glimpse of Elysium or Beulah Land. The result is not unlike an alchemist’s camera obscura capturing evidence of a place that is at once just beyond the lens but as inaccessible as the netherworld.

It is indeed an ethereal heritage that Katrín has returned home to. Yet for all the prevailing themes that unify the series, there are as many elements that distinguish each individual photograph.

In photograph “Suðurland II” (2001) the exposure evokes not so much Iceland, but a Soviet Union of secret numbered cities or forgotten gulags. As if in a surreptitious snap taken by an exile, or by remote sensing, the northern sun illuminates what could be either launching gantries or oil wells, the technology reduced by the environment to its most primitive form. And for all the light shining downward, the cold is all encompassing, even while the chimera of the spires would suggest radiation passing through them, rendering everything within the frame lifeless, the dark swath at the bottom of the image not so much earth as inert sediment.

“Norðurland III” (2001) is, of course, more blatant in suggesting a Soviet/post-Soviet venue, as the Cyrillic lettering on the ship’s superstructure leaves little doubt as to its origin. The connection between the two worlds would seem logical enough, the shore being on the edge of the abyss, the Arctic beginning just beyond view. Whatever comes from over the horizon, whether Russian freighters, Siberian driftwood, Maersk containers, crates of oranges, or Algerian corsairs, their influences are deposited with the currents, forgotten a month later, but remembered for generations.

“Snæfellsnes” (2001) with its emptied house and connected outbuildings sitting at the foot of a glaciated mountain, the disposition of the sky and the line of the mountain carries a homely trace. As if harking back to the idyll of a silent film epic, the site resembles an archaic redoubt, however the substance, structure, and size of the ruin would indicate a fairly recent past. With its asymmetrical lines and lopsided cavities, the decrepitude is all pervasive — the former occupants having either perished or moved on to a more sustainable existence, as if the region as been formally deincorporated and declared an empty quarter, abandoned to the hinterlands.

In “Strandir II” (2000) the wreckage of the grounded ship, devoid of any masts or deck structure, righted only by an external framework, has merged with the land and the harbor, forming an inadvertent promontory. The hull, although still solid, would appear to have been picked clean by salvagers, its crew having disembarked more or less in safety to the shore. It is a sight reminiscent of the Falklands Islands and other high-latitude outposts, with generations of working ships beached and written off rather than venture further into treacherous seas. Any sense of memorializing seems happenstance, no plaques being necessary, the long, sculptural lines of the hulk itself serving as enough of a monument.

“Norðurland II” (2001) with its surplus Quonset Hut and mid-sixties Oldsmobile carries over to what now seems as much a mythic era in that it could be called “Middle Cold War.” The iconography of both the hut and car scream of a shabby American nostalgia, and unlike the previous images, it is not an abandoned site. The light above the car is on, glowing faintly, and there are no uneven traces of debris in the foreground, just a sparse functionality of the environs. But at most, there would seem to be only a skeleton shift in a workshop, the machinery idling during a summer dusk, the American influences counting as a decorative layer already settling back into the earth.

In “Strandir I” (2000) it is not clear if the factory overlooking the span of water, like the previous image, is a derelict or is functioning on some basic level, as a faint wisp of vapor emanating from the chimney appears to mimic the low-hanging cloud in the harbor. But it is the barest sign of life, as the right angles of the building settle into a foreground that is as opaque as volcanic ash – a parked car rendered a faint, half-submerged shape, lost among the murk. With its smudged cement surfaces, worn by time and the elements, it is hard to image the factory ever having supported itself so far on the periphery of any larger economy. Its only apparent link is the water and the narrow causeway and winding road on the right, and yet it might be purely illusionary, as if faces could be glimpsed in the detail as well. All that remains amidst the composition and the interplay of light is that the structure remains, the smokestack still reaching upward, almost a monument, a rust-belt obelisk.

“Að Norðan” (2000) sits under a shroud of overcast, the solitary stucco cottage reflected in a mudpuddle. It could be Ireland or straight out of the remembered potato fields of Günter Grass’s Kashubia, and somehow, as if by virtue of its placement within the frame, the cottage evokes a grandmotherly presence, left behind to a hardscrabble existence. It is a sentimental premise, or at least a projected sentiment, as the gulf between the comfortable, reflective present and the earlier generations who tried to make a viable living off such a landscape and often failed continues to haunt as much as any specter.

That “Suðurland I” (2001) should follow “Að Norðan” makes perfect sense, for beyond the link in the weather and the rain-filled puddles, the road winding towards the horizon is no doubt escaping the isolated world of the previous image. There is no sense of arrival, only departure, as if setting off and severing ties is an inevitable fact, but the loss is undeniable. For as much as the landscape is comprehended, having been measured, divided, and worked to exhaustion, it is only upon return that the final aesthetic transformation is apparent.

If arrival is to be had, it is in “Suðurnes” (1999) the overcast of the earlier images having broken, the road having deposited the perspective — in what may belie the title — to the edge of true North, Ultima Thule, the rough-hewn shrine serving as a marker. As much as it would seem morning, the lateness of the hour – or indeed the epoch – has been reached. It is the fact of the high latitude, the very sense of impossibility that buffets the place with a roar, and that there is indeed a palpable glory cast upon this knoll. It is a glory not dependent on the cross pushed up against the sky; the cross is simply another mythic application, another level of iconography, another visitor’s interpretation. The glory is that the patch of windblown high grass and distant mountain frame a rarefied pocket where the transcendent is to be glimpsed, a point where geography and the sublime converge.

Reykjavík 2004  

Directions

The two of them walk on the potholed road, away from here, towards the bottom of the image that appears to us. It has been raining and the rain has left us a different image of this area than the one we had before; we are located in the present. We don’t see where the two of them are coming from, we can only see what lays in front of us. They become smaller with each step, and when they disappear behind the hill that spreads out at the top of the frame the next picture takes over – but we can’t see that picture; at the moment our eyes are occupied by the past.

Here is a mountain and the mountain is sheltering a house. But no one lives in this house and therefore we don’t know what the inside looks like. It gazes upon the lawn outside through its hollow sockets; it gazes its own space, but nothing that it sees changes by being seen – everything continues to stay the same as always. At first I feel like time has erased all life that once was to be found here, but after a short contemplation I realize that it happened the other way around.

By looking around, the following questions emerge. What is the color of the grass reaching down towards the edge of the lake – and what is the color of the water? Is it possible to say that the mountain – when one looks in the other direction – displays a specific color, or that the dead eyes of an abandoned house are the same color as death? Is the rock lying on the ground somehow differently colored then the next rock? And what is the color of the sun? Does its color change when it disappears below the horizon? I don’t know the answers to these questions – first I need to see the grass, the water, the mountain, the abandoned house, the rock lying on the ground and the rock next to it, and the sun on the other side of the horizon.

The only purpose of the road is to point us in the direction that it is leading. The road doesn’t have any other purpose. And I’m not on the way that it suggests; I’m on my way here. For I recognize this place – here everything is as if it had been created from my own ideas: the mountain, the house, the water and the expanse, all of it small enough to easily fit in the eyes.

Massachusetts, Dec. 2001

Revenants

The phantoms suggested by the title of Katrín Elvarsdóttir’s series, Revenants, are of a different variety than the spectres that might float through a keyhole. The ghosts glimpsed in her photographs have more to do with things left behind to memory — earthly things, perhaps, but just as haunting. The items or places are inert, yet it is as if they radiate with some last vestige of emotion — a last gasp of imparted spirit.

The landscapes, originated on archaic equipment barely more advanced than a pinhole camera, hark back to the earliest era of photography. The territory is of a rural Iceland whose inhabitants have died out or moved on to better prospects, a condition not uncommon to many parts of the world, the cause being anything from industrialization, to climate change. The result is that the environments depicted could be of any high latitude, whether the post-Soviet Union, Labrador, or Patagonia. But because it is Iceland, the ghosts implied within the title are specific to their own culture. The Icelanders themselves may be re-established in Reykjavík or on extended trips around the world. But the folklore remains among the ruins, as if the previous generations left behind a sediment of emotion that has been absorbed into the soil, rendering each outcrop a sentient being. And if the Icelandic interpretation of their mythology is more literal than in other parts of Northern Europe, this would seem a logical enough proposition. Mythology has always fermented in the opaque regions just beyond sight of the campfire, or in the modern era, the zone beyond certifiable evidence. In the effort to maintain an authentic identity within the larger western industrial civilization, a link to superstition has carried over, allowing for a good amount of leeway in retaining a sense of the elves.

The land is nameless, the titles of the images not so much documenting specific locations in Iceland as denoting realms no more accessible than the ether of memory. It is in this way that the parallels exist between Katrín Elvarsdóttir’s own origins and her work, as she was born in Ísafjördur in 1964, but her family relocated to Reykjavík. After a period spent abroad during her teens in Sweden, she attended the University of Iceland studying French literature, followed by an extended stay in the U.S., where her inclination shifted to photography. Out of such an environment with so many disparate instincts, Katrín’s own personal sensibility resonates with an unflappable integrity. An individual artist with a distinctive body of work, she has functioned and survived within a larger, prevailing global culture, as evident in her shows during the late 1990s in Reykjavík, Florida, Denmark, and New England. Whether in photographs or collage assemblies, her imagery strikes a balance between narrative and a strong graphic instinct.

In Revenants, her attention shifts back towards the territory of her origins. She has pared down her technology to the most rudimentary of 120 format cameras, reducing her choices to the essential exposure, the rudimentary optics dictating a unity within the images, with concentric degrees of illumination emphasizing innate distances as palpable and yet indescribable as any glimpse of Elysium or Beulah Land. The result is not unlike an alchemist’s camera obscura capturing evidence of a place that is at once just beyond the lens but as inaccessible as the netherworld.

It is indeed an ethereal heritage that Katrín has returned home to. Yet for all the prevailing themes that unify the series, there are as many elements that distinguish each individual photograph.

In photograph “Suðurland II” (2001) the exposure evokes not so much Iceland, but a Soviet Union of secret numbered cities or forgotten gulags. As if in a surreptitious snap taken by an exile, or by remote sensing, the northern sun illuminates what could be either launching gantries or oil wells, the technology reduced by the environment to its most primitive form. And for all the light shining downward, the cold is all encompassing, even while the chimera of the spires would suggest radiation passing through them, rendering everything within the frame lifeless, the dark swath at the bottom of the image not so much earth as inert sediment.

“Norðurland III” (2001) is, of course, more blatant in suggesting a Soviet/post-Soviet venue, as the Cyrillic lettering on the ship’s superstructure leaves little doubt as to its origin. The connection between the two worlds would seem logical enough, the shore being on the edge of the abyss, the Arctic beginning just beyond view. Whatever comes from over the horizon, whether Russian freighters, Siberian driftwood, Maersk containers, crates of oranges, or Algerian corsairs, their influences are deposited with the currents, forgotten a month later, but remembered for generations.

“Snæfellsnes” (2001) with its emptied house and connected outbuildings sitting at the foot of a glaciated mountain, the disposition of the sky and the line of the mountain carries a homely trace. As if harking back to the idyll of a silent film epic, the site resembles an archaic redoubt, however the substance, structure, and size of the ruin would indicate a fairly recent past. With its asymmetrical lines and lopsided cavities, the decrepitude is all pervasive — the former occupants having either perished or moved on to a more sustainable existence, as if the region as been formally deincorporated and declared an empty quarter, abandoned to the hinterlands.

In “Strandir II” (2000) the wreckage of the grounded ship, devoid of any masts or deck structure, righted only by an external framework, has merged with the land and the harbor, forming an inadvertent promontory. The hull, although still solid, would appear to have been picked clean by salvagers, its crew having disembarked more or less in safety to the shore. It is a sight reminiscent of the Falklands Islands and other high-latitude outposts, with generations of working ships beached and written off rather than venture further into treacherous seas. Any sense of memorializing seems happenstance, no plaques being necessary, the long, sculptural lines of the hulk itself serving as enough of a monument.

“Norðurland II” (2001) with its surplus Quonset Hut and mid-sixties Oldsmobile carries over to what now seems as much a mythic era in that it could be called “Middle Cold War.” The iconography of both the hut and car scream of a shabby American nostalgia, and unlike the previous images, it is not an abandoned site. The light above the car is on, glowing faintly, and there are no uneven traces of debris in the foreground, just a sparse functionality of the environs. But at most, there would seem to be only a skeleton shift in a workshop, the machinery idling during a summer dusk, the American influences counting as a decorative layer already settling back into the earth.

In “Strandir I” (2000) it is not clear if the factory overlooking the span of water, like the previous image, is a derelict or is functioning on some basic level, as a faint wisp of vapor emanating from the chimney appears to mimic the low-hanging cloud in the harbor. But it is the barest sign of life, as the right angles of the building settle into a foreground that is as opaque as volcanic ash – a parked car rendered a faint, half-submerged shape, lost among the murk. With its smudged cement surfaces, worn by time and the elements, it is hard to image the factory ever having supported itself so far on the periphery of any larger economy. Its only apparent link is the water and the narrow causeway and winding road on the right, and yet it might be purely illusionary, as if faces could be glimpsed in the detail as well. All that remains amidst the composition and the interplay of light is that the structure remains, the smokestack still reaching upward, almost a monument, a rust-belt obelisk.

“Að Norðan” (2000) sits under a shroud of overcast, the solitary stucco cottage reflected in a mudpuddle. It could be Ireland or straight out of the remembered potato fields of Günter Grass’s Kashubia, and somehow, as if by virtue of its placement within the frame, the cottage evokes a grandmotherly presence, left behind to a hardscrabble existence. It is a sentimental premise, or at least a projected sentiment, as the gulf between the comfortable, reflective present and the earlier generations who tried to make a viable living off such a landscape and often failed continues to haunt as much as any specter.

That “Suðurland I” (2001) should follow “Að Norðan” makes perfect sense, for beyond the link in the weather and the rain-filled puddles, the road winding towards the horizon is no doubt escaping the isolated world of the previous image. There is no sense of arrival, only departure, as if setting off and severing ties is an inevitable fact, but the loss is undeniable. For as much as the landscape is comprehended, having been measured, divided, and worked to exhaustion, it is only upon return that the final aesthetic transformation is apparent.

If arrival is to be had, it is in “Suðurnes” (1999) the overcast of the earlier images having broken, the road having deposited the perspective — in what may belie the title — to the edge of true North, Ultima Thule, the rough-hewn shrine serving as a marker. As much as it would seem morning, the lateness of the hour – or indeed the epoch – has been reached. It is the fact of the high latitude, the very sense of impossibility that buffets the place with a roar, and that there is indeed a palpable glory cast upon this knoll. It is a glory not dependent on the cross pushed up against the sky; the cross is simply another mythic application, another level of iconography, another visitor’s interpretation. The glory is that the patch of windblown high grass and distant mountain frame a rarefied pocket where the transcendent is to be glimpsed, a point where geography and the sublime converge.

Af þessum heimi / Of this world

Parma ham, salami, red wine, laughter, jalapeno, bread, crying, pesto, mozzarella, chatter, Pellegrino, pasta, olives, demand, attention, happiness, discussion, dog, tiredness, chaos, and finally a child that gets up and runs away.

Dream, nightmare, narrative or reality. Katrín Elvarsdóttir’s photographs from a family dinner, on a hilly landscape (that appears as by change in one of the photographs), present all this to us at once. A family gathering that is ordinary but at the same time seems somewhat alarming. The photographs are a representation of the longing that every one of us carries within about a perfect world, a perfect moment, one that slips between our fingers when we least expect it and our life’s elaborate exterior stands like an empty shell unable to support the life within the circle. The dinner party contained within the circle that the photographs form is full of chaos and unexpected moments. The children create tension at the table, they shout out loud, demand more, not those greens, take a dance step between courses, spill and run away unexpectedly. The adults persist in carrying on with the conversation and enjoying their food. Keeping up the spirit and reminding themselves of the structure that creates a frame around chaos itself.

The photographs confirm what once took place. They also remove the moments from their original context and create a new narrative. With her photographs Katrin Elvarsdóttir creates a narrative based on moments in the life of her family. This is not the story of her family, however. These are not their memories, not their evening. They are only contributors to the story that the photographs bring us. We have to be content with that. We cannot penetrate inside the circle, into their minds and feelings – we don’t know locations, facts, names, dates. We are outside the circle. The narrative that the photographs present to us are fragmented, like in a dream or a memory that we don’t recognize but know that we partake in. It is in our hands to form a complete picture from this—or to let it be and allow the photographs to form a fragmented whole, a circle that doesn’t close.

Circular forms lead us from circular plates, bread baskets, sausages and tattoos into a world seen through other circular forms – a hole in a wall and a half-open window. Katrin’s photographs of landscape that appears through window panes and wall openings emphasize further the emotions that her images awaken, whether in dream, fiction or in reality itself. Our viewpoint is always limited and fragmented. Every day we try to give our life and memories a complete picture. Create a framework, a circle that we incessantly persist in closing even tough we know that if we succeed we can’t let anything else inside. That’s how it ends.

Parmaskinka, salami, rauðvín, hlátur, jalapeño, brauð, grátur, pestó, mozzarella, skvaldur, pellegrino, pasta, ólívur, heimtufrekja, athygli, hamingja, samræða, hundur, þreyta, ringulreið og að lokum barn sem stendur á fætur og hleypur burt.

Draumur, martröð, frásögn eða veruleiki. Ljósmyndir Katrínar Elvarsdóttur af fjölskyldukvöldverði í hæðóttu landslagi (sem birtist eins og fyrir tilviljun á einni myndinni) birta okkur þetta allt í senn. Fjölskylduboð sem er í senn hversdagslegt en um leið örlítið ógnvekjandi. Ljósmyndirnar eru eins konar birtingarmynd þeirrar þrár sem hver maður ber með sér um fullkominn heim, fullkomið augnablik, sem smýgur burt úr greipum okkar þegar minnst varir og úthugsuð umgjörðin um líf okkar stendur eftir eins og illa gerður hlutur sem hefur enga burði til að móta það líf sem er innan hringsins. Borðhaldið sem á sér stað innan þess hrings sem ljósmyndin skapar umgjörð um er uppfullt af ringulreið og óvæntum augnablikum. Börnin skapa spennu við borðið, þau hrópa upp yfir sig, heimta meira að drekka, vilja ekki svona grænt, taka dansspor milli rétta, hella niður og hlaupa burt þegar minnst varir. Þeir fullorðnu þrjóskast við að halda uppi samræðum og njóta matarins. Halda sínu striki og minna sig á þá umgjörð sem skapar ramma utan um sjálfa ringulreiðina.

Ljósmyndirnar staðfesta það sem eitt sinn átti sér stað. Þær rífa augnablikið jafnframt úr samhengi og skapa þannig nýja frásögn. Með ljósmyndum sínum skapar Katrín Elvarsdóttir frásögn sem hún byggir á raunverulegum augnablikum í lífi fjölskyldu sinnar. Þetta er þó ekki saga fjölskyldu hennar. Þetta eru ekki þeirra minningar, ekki þeirra kvöldstund. Þau leggja aðeins til efni í þá sögu sem ljósmyndirnar færa okkur. Við verðum að láta okkur það nægja. Getum ekki þröngvað okkur inn fyrir, inn í hugarheim þeirra og tilfinningar, þekkjum ekki staðhætti, staðreyndir, nöfn og dagsetningar. Við erum utan hringsins. Sú frásögn sem ljósmyndirnar birta okkur er brotakennd, líkt og í draumi eða minningu sem við könnumst ekki almennilega við en vitum að við eigum hlutdeild í. Það er í okkar valdi að skapa úr þessu heildstæða mynd – eða láta það vera og leyfa ljósmyndunum að mynda brotakennda heild, hring sem ekki lokast.

Hringlaga form leiða okkur frá hringlaga diskum, brauðkörfum, pylsum og húðflúri yfir í veröld sem við virðum fyrir okkur í gegnum önnur hringlaga form, gat í vegg og hálfopinn glugga. Ljósmyndir Katrínar af landslagi sem birtist okkur í gegnum gluggarúður og gluggaop undirstrika enn frekar þá tilfinningu sem ljósmyndir hennar vekja, að heimurinn birtist okkur ætíð á brotakenndan og afmarkaðan hátt, hvort heldur í draumi, skáldskap eða í veruleikanum sjálfum. Sjónarhorn okkar er ætíð takmarkað og brotakennt. Alla daga leitumst við þó við að gefa lífi okkar og minningum heildsteypta mynd. Skapa umgjörð, hring sem við þrjóskumst í sífellu við að loka jafnvel þó að við vitum að ef það tekst getum við ekki hleypt neinu öðru inn. Þannig endar þetta.

Sigrún Sigurðardóttir

Reykjavík

May 2007

Margsaga / Equivocal

Reykjavik, Apr. 2011

All events are ruled by the laws of narrative. Some events we incorporate into our own story, reflecting on them again and again as memories and retelling them in the context of a particular time and point of view. Repetition registers events, so to speak, preserving them as part of reality. However, a narrative does not only bow to the laws of the person expressing it but also those of the receiver.

Things shift, events take place in reverse order and the story is created again. A photographer intending to decisively register a time and a place in reality is thus hard pressed to prevent the viewer from filling in the gaps with his or her own imagination. What took place before or after a particular moment? What can be found outside the rectangular frame? In this sense, people either speak of the dictatorship of the viewer or the death of the author. Under the circumstances, it is remarkable that people should generally agree that some things can be defined as reality and others not. Equivocal is the concept artist Katrín Elvarsdóttir uses in her roving between fiction and reality.

The first image Elvarsdóttir shot in the series Equivocal was TV Room; a perfectly straightforward photograph showing the interior of a room, but as a setting it gives free rein to the imagination. The furniture is old-fashioned but you sense this is caused more by apathy than by nostalgia, as the space is not necessarily cosy in the traditional sense. The maple tree outside is also uncomfortably close to the window and bars all view from this gloomy dwelling. This fetching photograph was asking for company and Elvarsdóttir answered its call. Soon, a diverse world of images came into being, based on different points of view within homes, vehicles and institutions. The work came together slowly but surely over the span of a few years, in Poland and Hungary, in Iceland and Italy, wherever Elvarsdóttir came upon the right circumstances on her research journeys. She playfully sought out similar circumstances so that the images might just as well seem to come from the same place.

Elvarsdóttir puts forward the equivalent of time and place, scenery for unrecorded events. To this she adds characters who are introduced as inscrutable participants in a twisted plot. The uncertainty implicit in that which Elvarsdóttir’s images don‘t show makes your hair stand on end. She is forever referencing something that is just around the corner – curtains are pulled and people turn their backs to the camera – there is obviously something we’re not being allowed to see. The home is not shown as a sanctuary but rather a place of secrets and repression. There is a stillness over the images because it appears nothing is happening, but this calm is loaded with tension. The stage is empty and the characters stand passively by. Each photograph is a moment which makes you think about what has just happened or what may happen as a consequence. Is this a state of uncertainty after some momentous event or is it the calm before the storm?

Elvarsdóttir lays out the visible and hidden material in the context of an entire series of photographs. There she opens up the possibility for viewers to connect individual images and fill in the blanks between them. She doesn’t let her fantasy run all over the place, however; on the contrary, she makes use of repetition in a moderate way, as well as references to motifs which echo between the images. Characters are introduced at different times of their lives, but stuck in the same place and even wearing the same clothes. In this work, you sense the circle of repetition, interrupted by the flickering through time. It is almost a dictionary definition of the experience best described as the uncanny: reexperience or déjà vu. The repetition of something based on vague premises, a forgotten or repressed experience, or something that never was but still seems familiar. A repetition that really should not be possible. As the images grow more familiar, the more they avoid making a specific statement. The series begins to describe a lasting state and events which only lack narrative in order to become reality.

The thought of the undefined yet momentous event suggested by the images keeps the viewers in tension on the verge of reality and fiction. Equivocal invites no demarcated meaning or interpretation, any story can apply, no single one is the right one – least of all the one coming from the author.

Reykjavík

April 2011

Reykjavik, Aug. 2008

We are inside looking out. We are outside looking in. A woman in a red coat, a mobile home after midnight, yellow curtains – these are all clues in a fragmented narrative that raises questions rather than provides answers. In the photography series “Equivocal” we witness enigmatic events that we inadvertently have taken part in. Like uninvited guests in a scenario that refuses to reveal whether it is fact or fiction. The fragments combine in multiple ways and force upon us incomplete story lines of an ambiguous nature. Whether we like it or not.

Við erum stödd innandyra og horfum út. Við erum stödd utandyra og horfum inn. Kona í rauðri kápu, hjólhýsi eftir miðnætti, gul gluggatjöld – allt eru þetta vísbendingar í brotakenndri frásögn sem vekja upp spurningar frekar en að gefa svör. Í myndaröðinni Margsaga verð&um við vitni að óljósum atburðum sem við höfum óvart ratað inní. Eins og óboðnir gestir í sviðsmynd sem neitar að uppljóstra hvort hún sé raunveruleg eða skálduð. Brotin raðast saman og þröngva upp á okkur margræðri atburðarrás. Hvort sem okkur líkar betur eða verr.

 

Vanished Summer

Reykjavik, Sept. 2013

To be an Icelander is perhaps in sum an endless wait. To wait for spring, wait for summer. Eternal optimism despite frozen ground and mounds of ice that seem rooted deep in the bowels of the earth, so firmly that the thought of living things in the ice-capped farmyard seems far-fetched, a daydream of the romantic sort, a flight of fancy.

For those who wait pining with summer-thirst, who hoping against hope scan land and sea for early signs of life in blasted fields and quiet woods, in silenced summer, who seek evidence of life, of a summer that seems determined not to come – when summer does come it comes so softly that it almost slips past, like a fragrance of summer in the offing, gone in the time it takes to pluck and chew a blade of grass, distractedly, in the dwindling hope of one who seeks and waits upon silent signs of warmth and life.

Summer’s arrival, instantly gone.

Yet its traces are perceptible. Shifts in earthen colours, the changing light; all that will go dormant again, fade and die. Seasonal dwellings: humanity itself is evidence.

We carry the vanished summer inside us and summon its images, late-summer sun striking a new-mown field, ruddy steam curling from a stream at the edge of the woods.

Life’s summers, vanished like everything else that never amounted to more than a promise. And again we drink in autumn’s arrival.

The land lies quiet and poignant.

The first time I set foot in Katrín Elvarsdóttir’s studio, three years ago, I felt as if I were stepping into a literary work. Her works tell a story and yet the story remains untold. It’s like stepping into a narrative, into surroundings that are foreign and yet familiar, perhaps because of how very familiar the subject matter of Elvarsdóttir’s photographs is.

An Icelandic mobile home in an unspecified locale in a grove of trees so nameless that you feel as if you were last there yesterday, however unlikely that might be.

A grove, the side of a house, a livingroom window, tidy carpeting neatly fitted to teak corner trim.

Fragments of reality. Traces of life, of habitation long or brief. Life at a remove, almost like a stage set yet not quite.

Plant-filled windows so quintessentially Icelandic, they’d be unmistakeable anywhere.

From up west in Bíldudalur? I ask. No, up west in Flateyri, says Katrín Elvarsdóttir, and we smile – of course. But I always think of Bíldudalur when I look at that photograph.

Stories that remain untold, that you inwardly compose as you look at Elvarsdóttir’s work.

That autumn day when I first visited her studio I felt as if I were re-experiencing these photographs though I was seeing many of them for the first time.

It felt just like stepping into the writings of Gyrðir Elíasson.

A half-told story, ending at the full stop but leaving you hanging, with questions on your lips and the uneasy sense that something has been left unsaid and lurks below to creep up on you, like the sneaking suspicion that things are not as they seem. Better shut the lid on all those uneasy chilly thoughts, and not let your imagination run away with you. Something might be hiding around the corner, behind the door.

We stand and ponder these windows with their potted plants and lace curtains that block the view, but maybe we are the ones being scrutinized, from beyond the houseplants and sheer curtains.

The Katrín Elvarsdóttir photographs presented here were not made as accompaniments to Gyrðir Elíasson’s work; rather the spirit of his work has been a companion to Katrín Elvarsdóttir in her travels around the countryside, like a feast moveable in space as well as time.

Harpa Árnadóttir

Double Happiness

Reykjavík, 2015

The photographs in this book were made in Beijing and Pingyao over a period of four years on three separate trips, the longest lasting a month. When, in 2010, my husband and I went to China for the first time to adopt our daughter Elva Qi, I was intrigued by the textures and colors of this peculiar country.

Being occupied by various other concerns at the time, I didn’t plan to produce a book of photographs taken in China. Two years later in blazing heat my then 4-year old daughter was walking with me through the hutongs of Beijing. She pointed at a pile of bricks and said, “Mom, look! Don’t you want to photograph this?!” And she was right – I did want to photograph it. And a whole lot more. This book encapsulates my experience and view of this unfamiliar environment, one that became increasingly familiar with every visit and ultimately convinced me to put together the book Double Happiness.

I want to thank my family for their support and encouragement.

Katrín Elvarsdóttir